From theory to analysis to practice: Bryce Millett Steinberg answers questions about her vision for the MPA program

In July, IJC Assistant Professor of Economics and International and Public Affairs, Bryce Millett Steinberg, took on the role of faculty director for Brown’s Master of Public Affairs program. As she begins her first year as director, she addressed questions regarding the program’s structure and some of its new features.

The new Faculty Director of the Master of Public Affairs Program, Bryce Millett Steinberg, came to Brown as a postdoctoral fellow in 2015 and joined the faculty in 2017. She earned her bachelor’s degree in economics from Brown in 2009, and her Ph.D. in economics from Harvard in 2015. 

Steinberg is a development economist who studies what shapes families’ and individuals’ investment in education and health in low-income countries. She has taught Economics for Public Policy (MPA 2460) during the first summer sequence of the MPA program since 2020. As she steps into her new role as faculty director, Steinberg answered questions about the program, why it’s structured the way it is and some of its new features.

The following question-and-answer session has been edited for clarity.

What attracted you to the opportunity to lead the MPA program?

I’ve taught in the MPA program for a long time, and I’ve always been on the front lines because I teach a very intensive part of the program when students first get to campus, so I’m one of the first faces they see when they arrive. I knew there were some things I wanted to do in the program that I couldn’t do as a professor. I’m really excited to think about the program as a whole now, and how its parts relate to each other, rather than just one piece.

How do students progress through the program over the course of the year?

Students start with a very intense, analytically focused summer session — some call it a “boot camp” — they learn two semesters each of econ and stats in 10 weeks. In the fall, in their coursework, they build on those tools and begin to dive deeper into a specific policy area, whether it’s climate, development, international finance, or something else. In the spring, they bring all of that together in their applications courses and, ultimately, create a real-world deliverable in the Policy In Action Project. So over the course of the program, students move from theory to analysis to practice. 

Why is mastering those analytical tools so important to get to that step where they are actually doing work on the ground?

You need that background to make good policy. I approach things from an economics perspective, and you need to master the conceptual side of economics to understand the various forces at play. For example, consider raising the minimum wage — it could raise income levels for the poor, which is good. But there are other forces at work that could produce bad outcomes, and you need to understand them. Raising the minimum wage could also raise prices or increase unemployment. At the end of the day, to create good policy, you have to be able to weigh those pros and cons to make informed decisions.

The Policy In Action Project is where students put theory into practice. Why is it so important for students to do that — to learn through doing — while they're still in the program?

Some things are hard to teach in a classroom. For example, in classes, when we give you a data set for a problem, it’s perfect. Everything is labeled perfectly; there are no missing variables. Everything is constructed in a way that, if you do the problem right, you’ll get the right answer. But in the real world, things are considerably more complicated. You might download data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and find that there are things missing or that it’s not constructed the way you thought it would be. You might find the whole year of data missing. You don’t know until you get in there. It’s hard to teach students how to handle problems like that without giving them a real opportunity to do it. The PIA gives students a chance to do these things, but in a controlled environment with more supervision and mentorship than they’ll find in the workplace.

I think they learn a lot by diving into a project the way they would in the workforce, and they learn a lot from each other as they do it. Some students come in with a lot of workplace experience, while others bring strong analytical skills but less real-world experience. That’s what makes diverse working groups so effective — they let students learn from each other and their varied experiences. In this program, you learn from your peers as much as you learn from your professors. 

Some things are hard to teach in a classroom…in classes, when we give you a data set for a problem, it’s perfect. Everything is labeled perfectly; there are no missing variables. Everything is constructed in a way that, if you do the problem right, you’ll get the right answer. But in the real world, things are considerably more complicated.

Bryce Millett Steinberg Faculty Director, Master of Public Affairs Program
 
Bryce Millett Steinberg headshot

What kind of student are you hoping to attract to the MPA program?

There is no single type of student, because I believe the program’s strength lies in its diversity. I mean that in a very broad sense — diversity of experience; diversity of ideas; diversity of talents. A diverse group is far more valuable than a homogeneous one, because you don’t learn as much from being around people who are just like you. In class, it’s great to have diverse voices when we talk about policies because things can work very differently in different contexts. Policies can affect different groups differently, or they may work in one place but not in another. So it’s good to get a variety of perspectives. We like to bring in students with a wide array of work backgrounds, whether it’s at NGOs, in state or local government, or working on the Hill, along with students who have just graduated. And we like to see a wide array of skills within the group, whether it’s writing, analytics, statistics and economics, politics, sociology, or anthropology. Having all those things helps create a stronger cohort, and it remains valuable to our students after they graduate because their cohort becomes part of their network.

What changes to the program this year are you excited about?

The big change this year is that we added five policy tracks so that students have the option to pursue a specific area of interest. The tracks are climate, energy and environmental policy, international development, international finance and economics, international security, and social and economic policy. These named tracks offer students a new way to structure their curriculum and integrate their learning by focusing on connected clusters of issues.

We’re also making some changes to the Policy In Action Project to include more mentorship. We’ve brought in recent alumni mentors for each group to help guide them through the process. We think having some guidance from people who are further along in their career trajectory, but not professors or senior mentors, will be very valuable for students. Recent graduates really know what students are going through, the challenges they're facing, and what challenges lie ahead. 

Where do you see the program going over the next five years?

Over the next five years, we want to keep refining the course offerings so students get the most out of their 12 months on campus, and to integrate more faculty expertise into the MPA courses. I am excited to see how students respond to the changes we have made and to incorporate their feedback as we continue improving the program.